AOAV: all our reportsDronesMilitarism examined

UK Ministry of Defence under scrutiny for omitting thousands of drones in annual inventory

UK Defence Ministry, UAV, Reaper Drone, Administrative Error, Military Inventory, Defence Equipment

The UK Ministry of Defence (MoD) has come under fire for what it describes as an “administrative error” that led to the omission of almost 30 different types of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) from its annual equipment inventory report. This significant oversight has sparked concerns and criticism regarding the management and transparency of the UK’s defence assets.

The Financial Times found that the official statistics detailing the UK’s military hardware, particularly drones, were significantly underestimated. The 2023 edition of the UK armed forces equipment and formations statistics reported a mere 55 UAVs, a stark contrast to the actual numbers.

The MOD’s report listed only the two largest drone types – 10 Reaper hunter-killer aircraft and 45 Watchkeeper surveillance systems – while completely excluding nearly 30 other UAV types actively used by the British military. This misrepresentation has led to serious questions about the accuracy and reliability of the MoD’s reporting mechanisms.

The undervalued count of drones in the official report is particularly concerning given the rising importance of UAVs in modern warfare, as evidenced by the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. Admiral Sir Tony Radakin, chief of the UK defence staff, emphasized the significant role of drones in current combat scenarios, highlighting the need for accurate reporting and inventory management.

In response to the oversight, the MoD acknowledged the error and affirmed its commitment to thousands of cutting-edge aerial vehicles, designed to enhance the lethality and effectiveness of the armed forces. This statement, however, has done little to quell the criticisms from various quarters.

The Labour party, in particular, has been vocal in its criticism of the Conservative government’s handling of defence matters. John Healey, Labour’s shadow defence secretary, called the error symptomatic of the Conservative government’s mismanagement over the past 13 years, especially in the context of rising global threats and the ongoing war in Ukraine.

Defence analysts and experts have expressed concerns about the credibility of the MoD’s other reported statistics, given this significant oversight. Francis Tusa, editor of the Defence Analysis newsletter, questioned the accuracy of data regarding other military equipment, such as tanks and frigates, and has filed a complaint with the Office for Statistics Regulation (OSR).

The issue also raises questions about the UK’s current capabilities in drone warfare. While the UK is on par with other European nations in terms of drone technology, it significantly trails behind major powers like the US, China, and Russia in both fleet size and variety.

Recent developments in the UK’s drone programs have been a mixed bag. The Protector program, aimed at replacing the aging Reaper fleet with new large armed drones, has experienced delays and cost overruns. Additionally, the Royal Navy’s successful autonomous landing of a large UAV on an aircraft carrier marks a significant advancement in drone technology.

Dr Iain Overton of AOAV said of the oversight: “Every weapon of war carries with it a responsibility for those who deploy it, to ensure it is used within the boundaries of international law and with a keen awareness of its impact on both combatants and civilians. This failure to state how many UAVs are in the British miltary arsenals raises deeper questions as to just how open the MOD is being in its application of lethal power. It’s imperative that we hold ourselves to the highest standards of accountability and transparency in the use of military technology.”

As the MoD works to rectify this oversight and ensure accurate reporting in the future, the episode serves as a reminder of the critical role accurate data plays in national security and defence planning.