AOAV: all our reportsMilitarism examinedGender and violence

Unveiling the hidden struggles of women in the British Armed Forces: insights from The Observer’s investigative report

In an insightful investigative piece by The Observer’s Yvonne Roberts, the multifaceted and often troubling experiences of women in the UK’s armed forces are meticulously detailed, painting a picture of a system grappling with deep-rooted issues of harassment, discrimination, and institutional inertia. Through personal stories and detailed analysis, Roberts brings into focus the complex realities that women like Alice and Laura, who joined the armed forces with aspirations and ideals, confront within this traditionally male-dominated sphere.

The British Army’s post on Women in the Army has a list of FAQs

Alice’s journey, having joined the Royal Military Academy Sandhurst in 2017, encapsulates the dichotomy of the military experience for many women. While she found camaraderie, respect, and friendship, these positives were marred by an undercurrent of harassment and objectification. “I quickly learned to become ‘hyper-vigilant’ because of harassment, objectification and ‘a sexualised undercurrent’,” Alice recounts, highlighting the constant state of alertness she had to maintain. This tension reached a harrowing peak when she was sexually assaulted by a fellow officer, an incident she felt unable to report due to the overwhelming implications it would have on her career and trust within the regiment.

Laura’s experience further underscores the systemic issues prevalent in the military. Joining the Army as a private at 17, she rose to the rank of captain, only to be medically discharged after nearly two decades of service marred by post-traumatic stress and a severe mental breakdown. Laura’s narrative is one of enduring sexual harassment and assault, a situation exacerbated by a lack of support and accountability from the military hierarchy. “My section commander was an absolute fiend, touching my body, touching my clothes,” Laura recalls, reflecting a culture where such behavior went unchecked and often normalized.

The Observer’s report delves into the broader context of these individual stories, illustrating a pattern of rampant misogyny, bullying, and criminal behavior within the armed forces. The most extensive parliamentary inquiry into the lives of women in the armed forces, chaired by former soldier and Conservative MP Sarah Atherton, exposed these systemic issues. More than 4,000 serving female personnel gave evidence, revealing disturbing practices such as gang rape, sexual assault, and a culture of silence fueled by fear of retribution.

The article sheds light on the institutional challenges in addressing these issues, particularly the resistance to diversity and inclusion initiatives. A telling example is the case of Alice’s squadron commander, who openly displayed sexist views despite being the regimental diversity and inclusion lead. This highlights a disconnect between policy and practice, where reforms and ‘zero tolerance’ policies are undermined by those tasked with their implementation.

Roberts’ investigation also points to a slow but ongoing process of reform within the armed forces. Initiatives like improved childcare, career flexibility, and the establishment of a Victim Witness Care Unit signal a recognition of the need for change. However, the persistence of scandals and the slow pace of cultural shift suggest a long road ahead.

In conclusion, The Observer’s report, through the compelling stories of Alice, Laura, and others, brings to the forefront the urgent need for a cultural and systemic overhaul in the UK’s armed forces. It underscores the need for effective implementation of reforms, a shift in attitudes, and a commitment to ensuring a safe and respectful environment for all service members, irrespective of gender. The journey is arduous, but essential for the integrity and effectiveness of the armed forces.