AOAV: all our reportsExplosive violence in IsraelExplosive violence by the Israeli Defense Forces

Israel accused of targeting civilians in deadly West Bank attack

In a recent incident in the occupied West Bank, an Israeli airstrike in al-Shuhada village, 10km from Jenin, has resulted in the deaths of seven Palestinian civilians. The event, investigated by the BBC, raises questions about Israel’s rules of engagement and the differentiation between combatants and non-combatants in conflict zones.

The victims, four of whom were brothers, were reportedly sitting around a fire when the strike occurred on January 7. Interviews conducted by the BBC with witnesses, relatives of the deceased, and a paramedic on the scene present a narrative that challenges the official account by the Israel Defense Forces (IDF). These accounts suggest that the men were not involved in any militant activities and that there were no active clashes in the area at the time of the strike.

Khalid al-Ahmad, the first paramedic at the scene, noted the absence of any signs typically associated with combatants, such as weapons or military attire. His observation appears to be crucial in assessing the context of the strike.

The IDF has linked the strike to an earlier military operation in the Jenin refugee camp, where a female soldier was killed. However, footage available from the IDF and a nearby CCTV camera does not conclusively demonstrate the presence of armed confrontations at the time of the airstrike.

The deceased, including the Darweesh brothers, were Palestinian emigrants with Israeli permits for agricultural work. Such permits are usually issued after thorough security screenings, suggesting that the holders were not perceived as threats by Israeli authorities.

In a statement, the IDF claimed the operation targeted a “terrorist squad.” This assertion stands in contrast to the lack of evidence of any militant activity at the scene, as noted by eyewitnesses and the absence of claims by Palestinian armed groups regarding the men.

The incident underscores the complexity of military operations in densely populated civilian areas. The IDF’s rationale, citing the pursuit of terrorists, is a common narrative in conflict zones but requires careful scrutiny to ensure compliance with international humanitarian law, particularly the principles of distinction and proportionality.

This event in al-Shuhada adds to the ongoing debate about the use of force in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. It highlights the need for transparent investigations and accountability in military operations, especially in contexts where the line between combatants and civilians can be blurred. The international community, particularly bodies like the United Nations, which has previously expressed concern over the use of military tactics in law enforcement operations, may find this incident a pertinent case for examination.

Dr. Iain Overton, Executive Director of Action on Armed Violence, said of the strike: “We must scrutinise this tragic incident to understand how such an alleged breach of international humanitarian law may have occurred, and – if it turns out to be true – to ensure accountability and the onging safeguarding civilian lives in conflict zones.”

The al-Shuhada airstrike is a reminder of the precarious nature of conflict zones where civilian casualties often raise critical questions about the conduct of military operations and the imperative of safeguarding non-combatants in accordance with international law.