The Ministry of Defence has announced what may prove to be one of the most significant health studies ever undertaken into the long-term wellbeing of British service personnel, launching a major investigation into cancer rates among an estimated 1.4 million serving members of the Armed Forces and veterans.
The Epidemiology of Cancer in the UK Armed Forces Study will examine whether those who have served since 1990 face elevated risks of cancer compared with the wider UK population. It will also seek to determine whether particular cohorts, including veterans of operations in the Gulf, Iraq and Afghanistan, have experienced disproportionately high rates of illness.
For Action on Armed Violence (AOAV), which has previously reported on concerns surrounding the long-term health consequences of military service, including the legacy of mefloquine use and repeated exposure to hazardous environments, the announcement represents a welcome and important development. The willingness of the Ministry of Defence to investigate potential harms at scale, rather than wait for further public pressure or litigation, marks a notable shift towards greater transparency and accountability.
We believe that transparency is infectious – once it starts within an organisation it can spread and illuminate other issues of concern. Let this be the case here.
The cancer study will draw upon military records alongside national cancer and mortality registries across England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. Findings are expected to inform future MOD policy, veteran support services and wider cancer research. Importantly, the research will include both regular and reserve personnel, with specific attention given to those deployed on operations such as GRANBY, TELIC, VERITAS and HERRICK.
An independent advocate, Dr Gareth Collett, a retired Brigadier and longstanding campaigner on cancer among former bomb disposal personnel, has been appointed to provide oversight and act as a point of contact for concerned veterans and their families.
For many former service personnel, questions surrounding cancer and military service have lingered for decades. From exposure to depleted uranium and burn pits to industrial chemicals, fuel emissions and other environmental hazards, campaigners have repeatedly called for a more systematic assessment of the health impacts associated with military life.
While the study has not been established in response to any one allegation or exposure pathway, its breadth is striking. By examining a population of more than a million individuals over a period spanning three and a half decades, the MOD has acknowledged that understanding the long-term consequences of service is not simply a medical question but a moral obligation.
As Dr Iain Overton, Executive Director of Action on Armed Violence says: “For too long, our understanding of the costs of war has been measured in the immediate: the casualties on the battlefield, the names on memorials, and the visible wounds carried home. This study acknowledges that conflict does not end when the fighting stops. Its consequences can emerge years, even decades, later.
“If the United Kingdom is prepared to ask difficult questions about the long-term health of those it sends into harm’s way, it may also encourage a broader conversation about the enduring impact of conflict on civilians around the world. The obligation to understand harm should not stop at the edges of the parade ground. It is a responsibility owed to all those whose lives are shaped by war.”
One thing is certain: the results will inevitably attract close scrutiny. If no increased risks are identified, the findings may provide reassurance to veterans and their families. If elevated rates are discovered among specific groups, the study could help shape future compensation arrangements, healthcare provision and preventative measures for serving personnel.
Either way, the decision to ask the question is significant. For a generation of veterans who have often felt that their health concerns have been overlooked or dismissed, this represents an important acknowledgement that service does not end when a uniform is hung up. The responsibility to understand its consequences endures long after.
Did you find this story interesting? Please support AOAV's work and donate.
Donate