The apocalypse is not now, it’s next: how fear became a global political and industrial obsession

Who benefits when security becomes a permanent emergency? Oxford anthropologist Ruben Andersson talks to AOAV’s Iain Overton about the politics and profits of fear, the expansion of surveillance, and why diplomacy and peace deserve a hearing.

Open Letter to the Prime Minister on military spending and the next NATO Summit

More than 50 UK civil society organisations – including AOAV – have written to the Prime Minister urging the Government to rebalance its approach to security by investing in diplomacy, development and climate action alongside defence, warning that an increasing focus on militarisation risks making the world less, not more, secure.

Defence company chiefs pocketed 138 times the average UK worker’s wage in 2024, with their average CEO annual pay increasing by £1.5 million in the last decade

Action on Armed Violence analysis found that CEOs of the UK’s largest defence companies earned an average of £5.2 million in 2024, with executive pay rising by £1.53 million on average over the past decade and far outpacing both median UK earnings and wider FTSE 100 remuneration levels amid growing military spending.

Are Britain’s 24 defence-funded universities fast becoming part of the UK’s military-industrial complex?

The UK has awarded £80 million to 24 universities to train the next generation of defence specialists, raising questions about the growing integration of higher education into Britain’s military-industrial strategy.

AOAV among organisations warning of higher education militarisation

Action on Armed Violence has joined a coalition of UK organisations in endorsing a statement urging universities to reject the Defence Universities Alliance, warning that closer ties between higher education and the defence sector risk undermining academic independence and accelerating the militarisation of campuses.

Universities face backlash over £2.5bn in defence partnerships as academics and students demand transparency and divestment

More than 1,500 academics and students have signed an open letter urging UK universities to end defence industry partnerships worth an estimated £2.5bn, intensifying debate over the role of military funding in higher education.

Trump’s border wars at sea: how the US is turning the Caribbean into a killing zone

Donald Trump’s boast of striking a “drug boat” off Venezuela exposes how America’s border has become a theatre of lethal sovereignty, where the state redefines law through violence and turns open seas into instruments of exclusion and death.

Silicon valley’s new front line: are US defence-tech firms exploiting Britain’s culture wars?

As far-right nationalism resurges in Britain, American defence-tech firms like Anduril and Palantir are exploiting patriotic imagery and political discontent to expand their influence, embedding themselves within the UK’s defence establishment and blurring the line between security, surveillance, and ideology.

Inside Palantir: profits, power and the kill machine

A former Palantir employee turned whistleblower has exposed the company’s deep entanglement with authoritarian surveillance, militarised AI, and the Trump administration—warning that its technologies, from Gaza to the NHS, are driving a dangerous global shift towards data-driven oppression and unchecked state power.

A critical commentary on the Prime Minister’s Govan speech and the expansion of Britain’s war economy

Keir Starmer’s Strategic Defence Review speech in Govan reveals a worrying embrace of militarism as national policy, ignoring the humanitarian and economic costs of Britain’s expanding arms trade.

Automating death: AOAV’s Iain Overton on Britain profiteering from war

AOAV’s Executive Director speaks to Platform Films about arms exports, AI in warfare, and the erosion of ethical accountability in UK defence policy

A dangerous overreach: why America’s proposed LEOSA Reform Act threatens more than it protects

The LEOSA Reform Act dangerously expands federal firearms privileges for current and retired law enforcement officers, undermining local authority, public safety, and the principle of firearm-free spaces.