Guns and knives
Of all weapons of violence, guns cause the greatest harm, followed by bladed weapons. It is estimated that over half a million of people die from armed violence every year and the highest proportion of these will be at the end of a gun. This is just those killed by guns, countless more are wounded, or take their lives with one. Knife crime, whilst harder to control, creates cultures of fear and violence that can fuel stabbings. AOAV seeks to stimulate the debate about guns and knives, and their role in violence, through detailed research and focused advocacy.
-

Does music fuel gun violence? A comparative analysis across five genres and settings
This comparative review finds that gun violence across Punjab, Chicago, Rio, Lesotho and Mexico tracks poverty, policing failures, criminal-market shifts and weapon flows rather than musical genres, showing that censoring songs does nothing to reduce homicides while investments in institutional capacity, prevention and gun-supply controls do.
-

Gun control policy in President Trump’s current administration examined
President Trump’s second term has marked an aggressive rollback of gun control measures, replacing public health approaches with a hardline pro-gun agenda that AOAV warns poses a serious threat to domestic safety and international norms on arms regulation.
-

Policy impact review: how a public health framing transforms gun control efforts
Here AOAV examines the effectiveness of framing gun violence as a public health crisis in driving legislative reforms, contrasting the successes of Australia and New Zealand with the limitations of the United States' criminal justice approach.
-

Responding to gun massacres: a discourse analysis of how political and media narratives shape health and justice responses
This report analyses how media and political narratives shape responses to gun massacres in the UK, US, and Australia, highlighting contrasting public health, criminal justice, and regulatory framings in the cases of Dunblane, Las Vegas, and Port Arthur.
-

How media and political framings of three gun massacres shaped legislative responses
This report examines how media and political narratives in the UK, US, and Australia helped shape both public opinion and gun control policy to gun massacres, revealing the distinctive impacts of public health and criminal justice framings on legislative outcomes.
-

The Lancet launches new commission on global gun violence and health; AOAV’s executive director Dr Iain Overton appointed co-commissioner
The Lancet has announced a new Commission on Global Gun Violence and Health, with Dr. Iain Overton, Executive Director of Action on Armed Violence (AOAV), as a co-commissioner, aiming to address the global burden of gun violence through interdisciplinary research and policy recommendations
AOAV's Guns and Knife Violence Research
“Guns don’t kill people; people do”: the global diffusion of gun-rights rhetoric and ideology examined
AOAV's investigation reveals how the NRA helped spread the slogan “Guns don’t kill people; people do” across the world, using political lobbying and rhetoric to shift blame from firearms to individuals and undermine evidence-based gun control.
Firearms licensing system in England and Wales ‘not fit for purpose’, watchdog finds, echoing AOAV’s concerns
Police inspectors have called for a national firearms licensing authority after finding England and Wales' current system is "not fit for purpose", echoing concerns raised by AOAV over inconsistent practices between forces.
Violent music is not evidence of violent crime: the danger of putting drill lyrics on trial
Drill and rap lyrics are increasingly being used as evidence in British courts. But violent music should not be treated as autobiography, nor performance as proof of participation in violent crime.
Hollywood and its guns: the questions behind aestheticised violence
This paper argues that Hollywood has long functioned as an influential, largely unregulated vehicle for normalising and marketing firearms by associating them with heroism, masculinity and power, with evidence suggesting these portrayals shape public attitudes towards guns and warrant greater public health scrutiny and regulatory transparency.
Tackling online and influencer glamourisation of gun violence: a UK and European perspective
This report by The University of Essex Human Rights Centre clinic argues that while UK and EU laws regulate illegal content and formal advertising, they fail to adequately address how influencers, online subcultures, and platform algorithms normalise gun-related and violence-adjacent behaviours, particularly among vulnerable audiences, and recommends a broader public health and regulatory approach to accountability.




